Lake Lanier Court Case Decision Disappoints Atlanta Print
Wednesday, 22 July 2009 00:52

Lake Lanier WaterThe judge presiding over the Jacksonville, Florida court case involving Lake Lanier has reached his verdict. His conclusion is that Atlanta will no longer be allowed to use water from Lake Lanier unless Georgia, Alabama and Florida don't settle their dispute within three years.

The three states have been arguing over the water in Lake Lanier for decades. In the court case Alabama and Florida argued that Lake Lanier was never built as for supplying water to neighboring cities and only Congress has the authority to allow such usage. U.S. District Judge Paul Magnuson agreed.

If the matter isn't settled within three years, the court will roll back the releases to mid-1970s levels, meaning only Gainesville and Buford would be allowed to withdraw water from the lake. That will be good news for Lake Lanier as less there will be less strain on its resources, but potentiall devestating for Atlanta which would have to look elsewhere for water.

Judge Magnuson's verdict was that:

"The court is sympathetic to the plight of the Corps, which is faced with competing and legitimate claims to a finite resource. Neither the Corps nor the court can make more water ... However the Corpsí failure to seek congressional authorization for the changes it has wrought in the operation of Buford Dam and Lake Lanier is an abuse of discretion and contrary to the clear intent of the Water Supply Act."

Here's a recap of what the three states want to do with Lake Lanier's water:

  • Florida: keep enough water flowing through the Chattahoochee River system to maintain marine life at the river\'s mouth.
  • Alabama: supplying a power plant along the river with sufficient water for cooling.
  • Georgia: feeding Atlanta's growing water needs.
Comments (14)Add Comment
0
Wayne Seguin
July 22, 2009

How does "U.S. Code TITLE 16 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 821. State laws and water rights unaffected
Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed as affecting or intending to affect or in any way to interfere with the laws of the respective States relating to the control, appropriation, use, or distribution of water used in irrigation or for municipal or other uses, or any vested right acquired therein. "

Not give us the right to use the lake for drinking water?

steve
steve
July 22, 2009

Sure it does. And we've got an interview with a Lake Lanier historian coming later this week. He disagrees with the judge's argument and thinks that water supply for Atlanta was absolutely part of the plan back in the 1950s.

We need to think longer term though. What happens if there's another exceptional drought? What happens if Atlanta keeps adding 1 million people every 10 years?

Our solution lies in more reservoirs, more conservation and more planned growth.

lakeman
lakeman
July 27, 2009

A solution to fix the water issue: Congress, back in the 1800's, set the Georgia / Tennessee boarder on the 35th parallel. A bad survey was quickly accepted by Tennessee, while Georgia NEVER accepted the survey. For over 100 years, Georgia has disputed that survey. The 35th parallel runs directly through Nickajack Lake on the Tennessee River. Congress set the line. A bad survey does not change what Congress set.

I feel that Georgia should quit claim any disputed property to Tennessee in return for a tap into the Tenn River. We could then use I-75 right of way for the pipeline down to a split with one leg going east into Lanier watershed, and a second leg continuing down I-75 into the Allatoona watershed.

This plan effectively ends the decades old Water Wars dispute between the southern states. Here's how:

Tennessee wins: They have their disputed land free and clear. The tap is a few miles from AL. Tenn has enjoyed full use of the Tenn River resource by this point. They won't miss a drop. No more disputes with Georgia.

Alabama wins: They won't miss the miniscule withdrawal. The Tenn River is huge. They will gain a forever full river system along the Chattahoochee River along the Alabama boarder with Georgia. Tons of water for their Dothan plant. No more disputes with Georgia.

Florida wins: Florida will forever have water flows keeping their sturgeon and mussels watered. Florida can now relax. No more disputes with Georgia.

This pipeline project is tiny compared to similar projects in Alaska (oil & gas pipelines) and Los Angeles (drinking water aquifers). This pipeline solves the water war between the states and provides several benefits for all of the states. This project would put a lot of folks back to work, and Lanier would be full indefinitely. Win, Win, Win.

State Senator David Shafer, Dist 48, has been working on this issue for years. Perdue should re-open this issue. Nobody ever thought William B. Hartsfield could ever build what he did for the State of Georgia. We need to be as forward thinking as he was.


0
Long Rifle Volunteer
August 04, 2009

We'll be waiting on you to try to tap the Tennessee River...........Lookout Mountain is a great vantage point over Dade (dude) county. Might be hard to lay pipe when your dodging lead.

lakeman
lakeman
August 04, 2009

Easy there davy crocket! Did you miss the point about "Tennessee Wins"? You get your land without dispute. You Win! No really, you win! Unless you want to fight a Congressional Deed. Then, good luck. But hey, we'll give it to ya, no sweat. And no lead either.

steve
steve
August 05, 2009

I suspect the chances of Georgia taking Tennessee land or water are 0.0001% or thereabouts unfortunately. GA relinquishing an old claim over TN land doesn't equal them allowing us access to take Tennessee River water.

I fear we're left with a hodge-podge of solutions and our politicians aren't smart enough to make them work.

lakeman
lakeman
August 05, 2009

Steve, A bit more info into this boarder issue. Congress set the line on the 35th parallel. Then, using the deed, a surveyor flagged the line and put it on paper. Tennessee quickly accepted the survey, and the line, as depicted. Georgia disputed the survey, and the flagged line, at that time. Georgia has revisited and re affirmed their dispute of this survey and line set every several years since then. It is all in historical records. The survey is wrong. Everybody knows that. That does not change the congressional deed. Georgia is NOT "taking" land or water, that isn't already theirs.

Just as Mangnuson drew his decision from the original "congressional" documents for Lanier. A judge will look at the original "congressional" documents (the Congressional Deed) for the property line location; the 35th parallel. The survey, having been proven to be inaccurate, holds no water!

0
SocialStudiesStudent
August 25, 2009

Thx for the interesting facts, sure to help out with my social studies debate project!(Im for GA!) I fhtere's any other facts you can tell me, id surely appreciate it!smilies/smiley.gif

lakeman
lakeman
August 26, 2009

Lots of facts on line. Just Google "Tennessee Georgia boarder dispute"

steve
steve
August 27, 2009

In fact that Tennessee / Georgia dispute was back in the headlines this week:
http://www.lakelanier.com/blog...ee-border/

0
Alice
August 28, 2009

I am currently in a debate group. Our standpoint is the Georgia Public. Now Steve, I understand the needs for Florida, but whats more imp.? Snails, Mollusks, ext. or us???? What would you say we should use against our opponents?

lakeman
lakeman
August 28, 2009

God rains down on the great state of Georgia. Georgians can set out buckets and barrels on their properties and capture all they want. Now, can Florida and Alabama claim that water as theirs? Its only that the water that flows into Lanier, and is contained within "Federal Lands", can it be claimed as "joint property". That said, why can't New York or Minnesota claim the water in Lake Lanier. Its just as much New York's and Minnesota's water as it is Alabama's and Florida's. That said, Georgia then, has a claim to ANY WATER in the USA that is empounded by or paid for by the USA federal government, right? Georgia not only has a Congressional Deed locating its northern boarder in the Tennessee River, The Tennessee River is federally owned and managed by the TVA. That gives Georgia, and all the other states in USA, the rights to the water in the Tennessee River, right? Georgia, Purdue, go up there and draw some "federal water" for the great state of Georgia. Done.

0
BOB
September 22, 2009

I can't beleive that some people think power plants and marine life is more important than human life. Lake Lanier is Atlanta's water supply and they're trying to take it away. That's just pathetic.!!!

0
Heather
January 22, 2010

Lake Lanier is in Georgia so why in the heck is Alabama fussing to get water from another state for their little power plant stuff they can use their own water in their state not Georgia's and I understand Flordia's complaint and their is enough water to go down for the wildlife. So you guy's need to back off.

Write comment
 
  smaller | bigger
 

busy
 

Site Sponsors